Skip to content
Search ESC
TemporalTemporal CloudGoPython SDKWorkflow Versioning

Temporal Workflow Engineering

Durable execution infrastructure for long-running agent workflows, retry logic, and stateful orchestration. We build Temporal systems that survive failures and scale to millions of concurrent executions.

What happens after you submit specs

1. Context

We inspect the system, constraints, and where delivery or architecture risk is most likely to surface.

2. Recommendation

You get a direct recommendation: audit, advisory track, scoped build, or a clear signal that the work is not ready yet.

3. Next Step

If there is a fit, we define the shortest path to a useful engagement and a production-ready outcome.

// Deploying multi-agent pipeline
$ langgraph deploy --agents 12 --checkpoint redis
Pipeline active · p99: 38ms · 800 concurrent
HITL approval gate enabled
LangSmith tracing: active

Durable Execution for Agent Systems

We engineer Temporal workflows for AI agent systems that require guaranteed completion, failure recovery, and long-running orchestration — from content pipelines to multi-step approval workflows spanning hours or days.

Typical engagement starts when

  • agent workflows fail silently because retry logic and state recovery were bolted on rather than designed in
  • long-running processes (approval chains, multi-step generation, external API orchestration) need execution guarantees the current stack cannot provide
  • the team is evaluating Temporal vs. LangGraph checkpointing and needs a decision grounded in operational trade-offs
  • existing workflow infrastructure (Airflow, Celery, custom queues) is straining under reliability requirements it was never designed for

What We Build

CapabilityWhat We Deliver
Workflow designTemporal workflow and activity patterns for AI agent orchestration, HITL approvals, and long-running tasks
Activity implementationIdempotent activities with heartbeating, timeout configuration, and retry policies for external API calls
Failure handlingCompensation workflows, saga patterns, and dead-letter handling for graceful degradation
ObservabilityTemporal Web UI integration, custom search attributes, and workflow tracing for debugging production executions

Engineering Standards

  • Workflow versioning with deterministic replay: safe deployment of workflow changes without breaking running executions
  • Activity heartbeats for long-running operations: detect stuck workers before timeout expiration
  • Search attributes for operational queries: filter workflows by customer, status, or business domain in production
  • Namespace isolation for multi-tenant deployments: separate workflow execution contexts by environment or team
  • Retry policies matched to failure modes: immediate retry for transient errors, exponential backoff for rate limits, no retry for validation failures

When to Use This

If Your Situation IsThen We Recommend
Agent workflows need guaranteed completion across restarts, deploys, and failuresTemporal workflows with durable execution and automatic retry
HITL approval steps span hours or days, not secondsTemporal signals and queries for human interaction patterns
Current retry logic is fragile (lost state, duplicate execution, silent failures)Temporal activity patterns with idempotency keys and compensation
Multi-step workflows coordinate external APIs with varying reliabilityActivity-level retry policies and circuit breaker patterns
LangGraph checkpointing is sufficient and you do not need cross-service orchestrationLangGraph Engineering — lighter-weight state management
Workflow is simple and does not need durable execution guaranteesDirect implementation without orchestration overhead

Temporal vs. LangGraph Checkpointing

AspectTemporalLangGraph Checkpointing
Execution guaranteeDurable across process restarts, deploys, infrastructure failuresCheckpoint persistence to Redis/Postgres; requires manual recovery logic
ScopeCross-service orchestration, external API coordination, saga patternsSingle agent workflow state, tool call sequences
DeploymentTemporal Cluster (self-hosted or Temporal Cloud)Application-level, no additional infrastructure
Best forLong-running workflows (hours/days), multi-service coordination, strict SLAsAgent state within a single execution context, rapid iteration

Use Temporal when workflows span multiple services, require compensation logic, or have SLAs that cannot tolerate silent failures. Use LangGraph checkpointing when agent state is the primary concern and cross-service orchestration is minimal.

Common failure patterns we fix

  • retry logic implemented per-activity with inconsistent policies, causing unpredictable failure behavior
  • workflow state reconstructed from database rather than replayed, breaking Temporal’s determinism guarantees
  • heartbeating omitted for long-running activities, causing premature timeouts and duplicate execution
  • workflow versioning skipped during deployments, corrupting in-flight workflow state
  • search attributes not designed upfront, making production debugging and operational queries impossible

What you leave with

  • Temporal workflows deployed with proper versioning, retry policies, and activity patterns
  • Operational runbooks for deployment, debugging, and failure recovery
  • Search attributes and observability configured for production querying
  • Architecture documentation for extending workflows without violating determinism constraints

Best Fit

  • Team has long-running workflows that must survive infrastructure failures
  • Organization operates multi-step processes spanning external APIs and human approvals
  • Engineering team needs execution guarantees beyond “retry and hope”
  • Product requires audit trails and replay capability for compliance

Depth of Practice

We operate Temporal workflows for autonomous content engines, multi-step approval pipelines, and cross-service orchestration. Production deployments handle millions of workflow executions with sub-second activity scheduling and zero lost state across infrastructure changes.

Next Step

Discuss your Temporal Workflow Engineering path

Submit system context, constraints, and delivery pressure. A Principal Engineer reviews every submission and recommends the right next step.

1. Context

We review the system, constraints, and where risk is most likely to surface.

2. Recommendation

You get a direct recommendation: audit, advisory, sprint, or pause.

3. Next Step

If there is a fit, we define the shortest useful engagement.

No SDRs. A Principal Engineer reviews every submission.