Skip to content
Search ESC
PyTorchMLflowscikit-learn

ML & Data Science

Model deployment, MLOps, anomaly detection, recommendation systems. From Isolation Forest ensembles to fine-tuned foundation models — PyTorch to production with full observability.

What happens after you submit specs

1. Context

We inspect the system, constraints, and where delivery or architecture risk is most likely to surface.

2. Recommendation

You get a direct recommendation: audit, advisory track, scoped build, or a clear signal that the work is not ready yet.

3. Next Step

If there is a fit, we define the shortest path to a useful engagement and a production-ready outcome.

// Model deployment status
$ mlflow models serve --model anomaly-detector-v3
Serving on port 5001 · GPU: A100
Accuracy: 99.2% · F1: 0.97
Monitoring: Prometheus + Grafana

Machine Learning That Ships to Production

From Isolation Forest ensembles to fine-tuned foundation models — we take models from notebook to production with full observability, A/B testing, and automated retraining.

Typical engagement starts when

  • a model concept looks promising, but the team needs a production path with monitoring, rollback, and evaluation before launch
  • anomaly detection, ranking, or classification is affecting live workflows and the current heuristics are no longer holding up
  • the organization has enough data and product pressure to justify ML, but not enough operational rigor around training and serving yet
  • leadership needs to know whether this is truly a model problem, a retrieval problem, or a rules problem before more effort compounds

What We Build

CapabilityWhat We Deliver
Anomaly detectionIsolation Forest, autoencoders, and hybrid ML/FM systems for real-time threat detection
Recommendation enginesCollaborative filtering and content-based systems with online learning
MLOps pipelinesMLflow experiment tracking, model registry, and automated deployment
Foundation model fine-tuningLoRA, QLoRA, and full fine-tuning for domain-specific performance

When to Use This

If Your Situation IsThen We Recommend
Detecting insider threats, fraud, or anomalies in streaming dataIsolation Forest + foundation model reasoning (healthcare pattern)
Recommending products, content, or actions from user behaviorCollaborative filtering + online learning pipeline
Need domain-specific LLM performance beyond base model capabilitiesLoRA / QLoRA fine-tuning with evaluation benchmarks
Models in production but no visibility into drift or degradationMLflow + Prometheus observability + automated retraining triggers
Classifying documents, images, or text across multiple languagesMulti-language NLP pipeline (StanfordNLP + custom extractors)
Not sure whether you need ML or a rules-based systemAI Strategy Advisory — assess data readiness first

Engineering Standards

  • Model versioning and experiment tracking via MLflow
  • A/B testing infrastructure for model rollouts
  • Automated retraining triggers based on data drift detection
  • Production monitoring with Prometheus and Grafana

These controls matter because ML systems usually fail at the operational layer first: no clear rollback, no drift visibility, and no agreement on when a model should stop serving production traffic.

Common failure patterns we fix

  • teams fine-tuning or retraining models before proving the data, labeling, or evaluation setup is strong enough
  • promising notebook results with no production path for rollback, observability, or safe rollout
  • models serving live traffic without drift detection, threshold review, or clear ownership when quality degrades
  • ML introduced where retrieval, rules, or product changes would solve the problem more simply
  • recommendation or anomaly systems tuned for offline metrics while production feedback loops stay weak or invisible

What you leave with

  • an ML architecture matched to the real business signal and production operating constraints
  • evaluation, rollout, and monitoring criteria that make model changes governable instead of subjective
  • serving, retraining, and rollback paths the internal team can operate without guessing
  • a clearer decision on where ML belongs in the system and where deterministic logic should still win

Best Fit

  • Team already has enough data volume, signal quality, and operational need to justify production ML
  • Use case depends on anomaly detection, ranking, classification, or domain-specific model performance
  • Engineering leadership wants experiment tracking, versioning, monitoring, and rollback handled as part of the system
  • Model outputs affect live product behavior, risk scoring, or analyst workflows and therefore need production discipline

Specialist Capabilities

CapabilityFocus
MLOps EngineeringModel serving, feature stores, experiment tracking, ML CI/CD
Next Step

Discuss your ML & Data Science path

Submit system context, constraints, and delivery pressure. A Principal Engineer reviews every submission and recommends the right next step.

1. Context

We review the system, constraints, and where risk is most likely to surface.

2. Recommendation

You get a direct recommendation: audit, advisory, sprint, or pause.

3. Next Step

If there is a fit, we define the shortest useful engagement.

No SDRs. A Principal Engineer reviews every submission.