Skip to content
Search ESC
KafkaFlinkSparkdbt

Data Engineering

Kafka, Flink, Spark. Real-time pipelines processing millions of events per day with exactly-once semantics. We build the data backbone that feeds your AI systems — from CDC ingestion to feature stores.

What happens after you submit specs

1. Context

We inspect the system, constraints, and where delivery or architecture risk is most likely to surface.

2. Recommendation

You get a direct recommendation: audit, advisory track, scoped build, or a clear signal that the work is not ready yet.

3. Next Step

If there is a fit, we define the shortest path to a useful engagement and a production-ready outcome.

// Streaming pipeline health check
$ kafka-check --cluster prod --topics 48
Consumer lag: 0 · Throughput: 2.4M events/day
CDC ingestion: 12 sources active
Schema registry: 340 schemas

Real-Time Data Infrastructure

We build the data backbone that feeds your AI systems — from CDC ingestion to feature stores, with exactly-once semantics and sub-second latency.

Typical engagement starts when

  • downstream AI, analytics, or operational systems are consuming data that is late, inconsistent, or hard to trust
  • event volume, replay requirements, or schema change risk have pushed the team past what scheduled jobs can safely handle
  • leadership wants the data layer treated as infrastructure with ownership, governance, and recovery paths instead of ad hoc glue
  • a product launch, migration, or AI initiative is exposing missing streaming, CDC, or feature-serving capabilities

What We Build

CapabilityWhat We Deliver
Streaming pipelinesApache Kafka with Kafka Streams and Kafka Connect for real-time event processing
Batch + streaming hybridApache Flink and Spark for unified batch and streaming architectures
Data transformationdbt models with testing, documentation, and lineage tracking
Feature storesRedis and Feast-based feature serving for ML model inference

Engineering Standards

  • Exactly-once delivery semantics
  • Schema evolution with Avro/Protobuf registries
  • Automated data quality checks at every pipeline stage
  • Infrastructure-as-code with Terraform

The important signal here is not just throughput. It is whether the pipeline can keep data trustworthy when schemas change, backfills happen, and downstream systems depend on the same event stream.

Common failure patterns we fix

  • Kafka or streaming infrastructure introduced before the operating model, schema discipline, or ownership model was ready
  • CDC and event pipelines that work in steady state but fail during backfills, replays, or schema evolution
  • batch and streaming paths diverging into conflicting versions of the same business truth
  • downstream AI and ML systems depending on feature freshness the platform cannot actually guarantee
  • no observability around consumer lag, delivery guarantees, or data quality until incidents reach the product layer

What you leave with

  • a data architecture aligned to actual latency, replay, and reliability requirements instead of tool fashion
  • ingestion, transformation, and serving paths with explicit ownership and production guardrails
  • delivery semantics, schema governance, and recovery procedures documented well enough for the internal team to operate confidently
  • a platform that can support AI, analytics, and operational workloads without fragile one-off pipelines

Best Fit

  • Team already has multiple data sources, event streams, or operational systems that need one reliable backbone
  • Product depends on low-latency events, CDC, feature freshness, or streaming analytics
  • Organization needs schema governance, replayability, and production-grade ingestion discipline
  • Engineering leadership wants the data layer treated as infrastructure, not as ad hoc glue code

When to Use This

If Your Situation IsThen We Recommend
Sub-second event processing, high throughput, exactly-once neededApache Kafka + Kafka Streams
Complex event processing, windowed aggregations, stateful joinsApache Flink on Kafka
Large batch jobs, ML feature engineering, data lake processingApache Spark / PySpark + Delta Lake
CDC from legacy databases, ETL from SaaS APIsKafka Connect + dbt transformations
Real-time dashboards, sub-second OLAP on event streamsApache Druid on Kafka
Data integration across heterogeneous sources, flow-based routingApache NiFi for ingestion layer

Specialist Capabilities

CapabilityFocus
Apache Kafka EngineeringReal-time streaming, event-driven microservices, Schema Registry governance
Apache Flink EngineeringStateful stream processing, CEP, exactly-once at scale
Apache Spark EngineeringLarge-scale batch/streaming, PySpark, Delta Lake, Databricks
Apache NiFi EngineeringData integration, flow-based programming, enterprise data routing
Apache Druid EngineeringReal-time OLAP, sub-second analytics, high-concurrency dashboards
Next Step

Discuss your Data Engineering path

Submit system context, constraints, and delivery pressure. A Principal Engineer reviews every submission and recommends the right next step.

1. Context

We review the system, constraints, and where risk is most likely to surface.

2. Recommendation

You get a direct recommendation: audit, advisory, sprint, or pause.

3. Next Step

If there is a fit, we define the shortest useful engagement.

No SDRs. A Principal Engineer reviews every submission.