Data Engineering
Kafka, Flink, Spark. Real-time pipelines processing millions of events per day with exactly-once semantics. We build the data backbone that feeds your AI systems — from CDC ingestion to feature stores.
What happens after you submit specs
1. Context
We inspect the system, constraints, and where delivery or architecture risk is most likely to surface.
2. Recommendation
You get a direct recommendation: audit, advisory track, scoped build, or a clear signal that the work is not ready yet.
3. Next Step
If there is a fit, we define the shortest path to a useful engagement and a production-ready outcome.
Real-Time Data Infrastructure
We build the data backbone that feeds your AI systems — from CDC ingestion to feature stores, with exactly-once semantics and sub-second latency.
Typical engagement starts when
- downstream AI, analytics, or operational systems are consuming data that is late, inconsistent, or hard to trust
- event volume, replay requirements, or schema change risk have pushed the team past what scheduled jobs can safely handle
- leadership wants the data layer treated as infrastructure with ownership, governance, and recovery paths instead of ad hoc glue
- a product launch, migration, or AI initiative is exposing missing streaming, CDC, or feature-serving capabilities
What We Build
| Capability | What We Deliver |
|---|---|
| Streaming pipelines | Apache Kafka with Kafka Streams and Kafka Connect for real-time event processing |
| Batch + streaming hybrid | Apache Flink and Spark for unified batch and streaming architectures |
| Data transformation | dbt models with testing, documentation, and lineage tracking |
| Feature stores | Redis and Feast-based feature serving for ML model inference |
Engineering Standards
- Exactly-once delivery semantics
- Schema evolution with Avro/Protobuf registries
- Automated data quality checks at every pipeline stage
- Infrastructure-as-code with Terraform
The important signal here is not just throughput. It is whether the pipeline can keep data trustworthy when schemas change, backfills happen, and downstream systems depend on the same event stream.
Common failure patterns we fix
- Kafka or streaming infrastructure introduced before the operating model, schema discipline, or ownership model was ready
- CDC and event pipelines that work in steady state but fail during backfills, replays, or schema evolution
- batch and streaming paths diverging into conflicting versions of the same business truth
- downstream AI and ML systems depending on feature freshness the platform cannot actually guarantee
- no observability around consumer lag, delivery guarantees, or data quality until incidents reach the product layer
What you leave with
- a data architecture aligned to actual latency, replay, and reliability requirements instead of tool fashion
- ingestion, transformation, and serving paths with explicit ownership and production guardrails
- delivery semantics, schema governance, and recovery procedures documented well enough for the internal team to operate confidently
- a platform that can support AI, analytics, and operational workloads without fragile one-off pipelines
Best Fit
- Team already has multiple data sources, event streams, or operational systems that need one reliable backbone
- Product depends on low-latency events, CDC, feature freshness, or streaming analytics
- Organization needs schema governance, replayability, and production-grade ingestion discipline
- Engineering leadership wants the data layer treated as infrastructure, not as ad hoc glue code
When to Use This
| If Your Situation Is | Then We Recommend |
|---|---|
| Sub-second event processing, high throughput, exactly-once needed | Apache Kafka + Kafka Streams |
| Complex event processing, windowed aggregations, stateful joins | Apache Flink on Kafka |
| Large batch jobs, ML feature engineering, data lake processing | Apache Spark / PySpark + Delta Lake |
| CDC from legacy databases, ETL from SaaS APIs | Kafka Connect + dbt transformations |
| Real-time dashboards, sub-second OLAP on event streams | Apache Druid on Kafka |
| Data integration across heterogeneous sources, flow-based routing | Apache NiFi for ingestion layer |
Specialist Capabilities
| Capability | Focus |
|---|---|
| Apache Kafka Engineering | Real-time streaming, event-driven microservices, Schema Registry governance |
| Apache Flink Engineering | Stateful stream processing, CEP, exactly-once at scale |
| Apache Spark Engineering | Large-scale batch/streaming, PySpark, Delta Lake, Databricks |
| Apache NiFi Engineering | Data integration, flow-based programming, enterprise data routing |
| Apache Druid Engineering | Real-time OLAP, sub-second analytics, high-concurrency dashboards |
Deployments in this area
Real-time anomaly detection processing 2.4M events/day with 70% fewer false positives
How we built a real-time anomaly detection pipeline processing 2.4M events/day using Kafka, Isolation Forest, and foundation models. False positive rate reduced from 68% to under 20%.
Real-Time IoT Analytics Platform for Smart Agriculture
We built a real-time streaming analytics platform for an AgriTech startup, processing live GPS data from farming equipment to track field coverage, calculate equipment utilization, and deliver dynamic ETAs to mobile devices.
Related articles
Feature Engineering That Survives Production: Drift Detection and the Features That Break
80% of production ML failures trace to features, not models. Here's which feature types break first and how to detect and prevent drift before it reaches users.
Data EngineeringNoSQL in Production AI Systems: When Document Stores, Wide-Column, and Graph Databases Earn Their Place
A technical guide to selecting NoSQL databases for production AI: MongoDB, Cassandra, Neo4j, Redis, and when PostgreSQL extensions replace a dedicated store.
MLOpsML Pipeline Orchestration: Airflow, Kubeflow, and Temporal Compared for Production Model Training
A direct comparison of Airflow, Kubeflow Pipelines, and Temporal for ML training pipelines — covering GPU scheduling, retry semantics, and operational fit.
Discuss your Data Engineering path
Submit system context, constraints, and delivery pressure. A Principal Engineer reviews every submission and recommends the right next step.
1. Context
We review the system, constraints, and where risk is most likely to surface.
2. Recommendation
You get a direct recommendation: audit, advisory, sprint, or pause.
3. Next Step
If there is a fit, we define the shortest useful engagement.
No SDRs. A Principal Engineer reviews every submission.